Supabase Revenue: the numbers, graded
Supabase has never published a revenue figure. Every ARR number in circulation — $170M, $101M, $70M — is a third-party estimate, and they all trace back…
Supabase has never published a revenue figure. Every ARR number in circulation — $170M, $101M, $70M — is a third-party estimate, and they all trace back to one research firm. What Supabase states itself is funding and usage: $500M raised in June 2026 at a $10.5B post-money valuation, 250,000+ customers, nearly 10 million developers. Below is every public figure with its source and grade, then what the 23 businesses in our index built on Supabase actually earn.
Contents
What is Supabase's revenue?
Nobody outside the company knows. The best-supported public estimate is $170M ARR as of May 2026, published by the research firm Sacra and repeated everywhere else. Supabase has not confirmed it. In October 2025 the company declined to disclose current revenue figures to Fortune, and it has not disclosed one since.
That silence is consistent, not evasive. Supabase's own Series F announcement on 4 June 2026 runs through developer counts and database growth without a single dollar of revenue in it. When a company talks that freely about usage and stays quiet about money, take the usage numbers as the ones it wants judged.

Which figures are actually public?
Fourteen figures are genuinely sourceable, and seven come from Supabase itself. Everything the company has said is about capital and usage. Everything about revenue is an outside estimate. The grades below are exactly that distinction — who said it, not how large it is.
| Figure | Date | Source | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| $500M Series F, $10B pre-money | 4 Jun 2026 | Supabase blog | Company-stated |
| $10.5B post-money valuation | 4 Jun 2026 | Supabase press release | Company-stated |
| Over $1B raised in total | 4 Jun 2026 | Supabase press release | Company-stated |
| 250,000+ customers | 4 Jun 2026 | Supabase press release | Company-stated |
| Nearly 10M developers, doubled in eight months | 4 Jun 2026 | Supabase blog | Company-stated |
| Database launches +600% YoY; 60%+ started by an AI tool | 4 Jun 2026 | Supabase blog | Company-stated |
| Paid plans from $25/mo (Pro) and $599/mo (Team) | Current | Supabase pricing | Company-stated |
| $100M Series E at $5B | 3 Oct 2025 | Fortune | Reported by press |
| $200M Series D at $2B | Apr 2025 | Fortune | Reported by press |
| Valuation doubled in eight months | 5 Jun 2026 | TechCrunch | Reported by press |
| $170M ARR, up ~221% YoY | May 2026 | Sacra | Third-party estimate |
| ~$101M ARR | End 2025 | Sacra | Third-party estimate |
| ~$700 revenue per customer per year | 2026 | Sacra | Third-party estimate |
| $170M annual revenue, labelled an estimate | 2026 | GetLatka | Third-party estimate |
Note what is absent. No recognized revenue, no gross margin, no net revenue retention, no statement on profitability, no split between self-serve and enterprise. Any page claiming those exists is filling gaps with invention.
Why does every site show $170M ARR?
Because they are all quoting one source. Sacra estimated $170M ARR for May 2026 and ~$101M at the end of 2025; GetLatka carries the same $170M and labels it an estimate too. Repetition across ten sites is one data point restated ten times, not ten independent confirmations.
The estimate does survive one cross-check. Sacra puts average revenue per customer at roughly $700 a year. Supabase's own release claims 250,000+ customers. Multiply and you land near $175M — close to the $170M figure. That is a coherence test, not proof: the ARPC is Sacra's own number, so the arithmetic is checking itself against a figure from the same lab. What it does rule out is the estimate being wildly off-scale, which is more than most private-company guesses can say.
The trajectory is the more useful part. Sacra's own series has ARR roughly doubling twice inside eighteen months, a shape that matches the company's 600% database-launch growth better than any single dollar figure does.

What does the $10.5B valuation imply?
At $10.5B against $170M of estimated ARR, investors paid about 62x. That multiple is priced on the database curve and the agent story, not on revenue — Supabase did not put a revenue number in its own announcement, and the funding press did not obtain one.
I read that as a deliberate choice rather than a gap. The Series F post leads with more than 60% of new databases being launched by an AI tool and names Claude Code as the largest single contributor this year. If ARR were the stronger number, it would be in the headline. Usage is the number Supabase is asking the market to price, and the market priced it. Other developer-infrastructure records in revenue reality, Algolia among them, lead with revenue; this round leads with usage.
What do businesses built on Supabase earn?
Far less than the valuation suggests, and that is the point. We index 23 businesses whose founders or the creators covering them named Supabase in the stack — a small sample, so read it as a shape rather than a census. Three carry third-party-verified figures, ten are founder-reported, seven are creator-relayed and three have no figure at all.
Grades, first use: ✅ third-party verified means corroborated beyond the operator's word, usually a dashboard read on camera. 🗣 founder-reported means the operator stated it and we could not check it. 📎 creator-relayed means someone passed on another person's number. 🔮 unproven means no figure disclosed, or a target.
| Case | Published revenue | Evidence | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minea / DropMagic | $750K MRR at peak; DropMagic $45K MRR in 4 months | 🗣 Founder-reported | /projects/loic-creator |
| Chart Detector AI | $56K/mo; $260K in 13 months; ~25% margin | 🗣 Founder-reported | /projects/chart-detector-ai-stock-chart-app |
| AI Amazon product research (Launch Fast) | ~$21.8K/mo at 90 days | ✅ Verified | /projects/launchfast-amazon-research |
| TrendFeed | ~$12,000 in the first 4 weeks | 📎 Creator-relayed | /projects/trendfeed-creator-growth-tool |
| Setter AI | $120K ARR (~$10K MRR), 40 customers | 🗣 Founder-reported | /projects/setter-ai |
| Starpop | $10K MRR; $15K across two products | 🗣 Founder-reported | /projects/starpop-ai-ugc-ads-ecommerce |
| Sleek | $10,000 MRR in 6 weeks, $0 marketing | 📎 Creator-relayed | /projects/sleek-prompt-to-website-design-tool |
| Uneed | ~$8K–10K/mo | ✅ Verified | /projects/uneed-launch-platform |
| Glow | ~$2,800 in 28 days | 🗣 Founder-reported | /projects/glow-nordic-winter-affirmation-app |
| AI resume builder (Cupsa) | $1,400 MRR, ~$16.5K lifetime | 🗣 Founder-reported | /projects/cupsa-ai-resume-builder-review |
| Guilty Chef | ~$700–800/mo, ~11,000 organic visits/mo | 🗣 Founder-reported | /projects/guilty-chef-programmatic-seo-recipe-directory |
| Fluently | ~$100 MRR, barely breaking even on ads | ✅ Verified | /projects/fluently-youtube-translate-extension |
Fluently is in that table deliberately. A verified $100 MRR is worth more to a reader than an unverified $100K. Three cases in the set — PermitSync, SpecSheet and a Trello clone demo — publish prices but no revenue, so they stay 🔮 unproven and stay out of any average.

What should a builder take from this?
Supabase's customers are not its case studies. Most businesses in that table earn four or five figures a month while paying Supabase $25/mo for Pro. Roughly $700 a year per customer is the whole model: enormous breadth, thin per-account revenue, growth from database count rather than seat expansion.
Two consequences follow. First, Supabase being a $10.5B company tells you nothing about whether your app will make money — Nate's five-tool stack and the landing-page bootcamp playbook both name Supabase, and both are graded creator-relayed precisely because the stack was never the hard part. Second, if Supabase is priced on agent-launched databases, expect the roadmap to serve agents rather than your hand-written schema.
For the platform itself, see what is Supabase. For the same grading applied to a company that does publish ARR, see ElevenLabs revenue; for the front-end half of this stack, apps built with Lovable.
More in revenue reality.
Frequently asked questions
What is Supabase's ARR in 2026?
There is no company-stated ARR. The most widely cited figure is $170M as of May 2026, published by the research firm Sacra and repeated by other data sites, all tracing to that one estimate. Supabase declined to give a revenue figure to Fortune in October 2025 and has not published one since, including in its June 2026 funding announcement.
Is Supabase profitable?
No public source establishes that either way. Supabase has disclosed no gross margin, operating expense, cash-flow or profitability figure, and no credible press report supplies one. A company raising $500M at a $10.5B valuation is under no obligation to be profitable, and nothing in the record says whether it is.
How much did Supabase raise and at what valuation?
Supabase raised a $500M Series F announced on 4 June 2026 at a $10B pre-money and roughly $10.5B post-money valuation, bringing total capital raised to over $1B. That followed a $100M Series E at $5B in October 2025 and a $200M Series D at $2B in April 2025.
Why do revenue estimate sites disagree with each other?
Mostly they do not disagree — they copy. The $170M figure appears across several data-broker pages because they draw on the same underlying research rather than measuring independently. Where numbers do differ, it is usually a date mismatch: end-of-2025 ARR and May-2026 ARR describe different moments and should never be averaged together.